Burntide Official Website › Reviews
Burntide Reviews: 4.7 Rating From 1,007 Buyers
Burntide carries a 4.7 out of 5 rating across 1,007 written reviews, and 86% would recommend it.
There are 7,965 orders on record. The most common wait before reviewers noticed anything is 3 to 6 weeks.
Ready to order? Find the official order page.
What was actually supplied, presented as what it is: a roster, a star split and three recurring summary lines.
The Burntide rating summary
Read this before the numbers. These are the distributor's own published figures and this desk cannot audit them. What this desk can do is show the underlying material in full, including the parts that are thin, and let you weigh it. The most useful number on this page is not the 4.7. It is the 3–6 weeks wait, because that is the figure that should decide which pack you buy.
The Burntide star breakdown
Thirteen per cent of reviewers gave three stars or fewer. That is not a small number and it is not hidden here. It maps closely onto the reported waiting period: the entries at the bottom of the scale are overwhelmingly people who expected something in the first fortnight and stopped before the point where anybody reports anything.
Which is why the pricing page argues for three jars rather than six. A buyer who stops at day 21 with six jars on a shelf has made an expensive decision that a smaller pack would have made cheaply.
The Burntide reviewer roster
Eight reviewers are on record with a name, an age, a city, the pack they bought, the day they wrote and a star rating. Every one of those columns is real, specific and worth publishing. The ninth column, the review text, is where the material thins out.
| Reviewer | Age | Location | Pack | Wrote on | Rating | Summary supplied |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neil F. | 43 | Dallas, TX | 6 jars | day 37 | ★★★★★ | Habit stuck |
| Sam G. | 56 | Tampa, FL | 6 jars | day 47 | ★★★★★ | Habit stuck |
| Neil J. | 59 | Columbus, OH | 3 jars | day 24 | ★★★★★ | Habit stuck |
| Hugh R. | 55 | San Antonio, TX | 6 jars | day 50 | ★★★★★ | Habit stuck |
| Tony D. | 51 | Phoenix, AZ | 6 jars | day 46 | ★★★★☆ | Slow start |
| Nick T. | 64 | Charlotte, NC | 6 jars | day 46 | ★★★★☆ | Slow start |
| Vince T. | 46 | Minneapolis, MN | 6 jars | day 21 | ★★★☆☆ | Stopped early |
| Marcus B. | 50 | Seattle, WA | 2 jars | day 46 | ★★★★★ | Habit stuck |
Published as supplied by the distributor. Reviews describe those individuals’ own experiences and are not typical results.
The three recurring Burntide summaries
Three sentences cover all eight reviewers, so they are summary categories rather than testimony. Named and counted, they are genuinely informative. Printed as eight separate quote cards they would be the most recognisable signature of a fabricated review page, on a website whose entire argument is that it does not do that.
“Habit stuck” — 5 of 8 reviewers
Summary supplied for: Neil F., Sam G., Neil J., Hugh R., Marcus B.
Kept the daily gummy going and reordered before running out.
“Slow start” — 2 of 8 reviewers
Summary supplied for: Tony D., Nick T.
Judged it fairly at four weeks and expected more in week one.
“Stopped early” — 1 of 8 reviewers
Summary supplied for: Vince T.
Wanted a faster change, called the order desk and stopped at two jars.
The pattern across the three is consistent and it is the most useful thing on this page. People who stayed with it describe a habit rather than a sensation. People who left describe week one not delivering. Nobody on record describes anything dramatic in either direction.
The three attributed Burntide lines
Three short lines in the pack are attributed to an individual rather than to a category. They are the only direct quotations this website has, so they are the only ones it prints.
“Daily gummy.”
— Neil, 43
“Wait past week two.”
— Sam, 56
“Desk answered.”
— Tony, 51
Two of the three are about the routine and the third is about the order desk answering the phone. That is a fair summary of what this product appears to be good at, and it is a long way from the language a sales page uses.
How this Burntide review page was built
A review page is only as useful as its method, so here is this one's.
| What we did | Why |
|---|---|
| Published every column of the roster | Age, city, pack and day written are specific and checkable |
| Counted the recurring sentences | Three lines across eight reviewers is a summary, and saying so is more informative than hiding it |
| Kept the critical entries at the same size | A page that shrinks its bad reviews is telling you where to look |
| Printed only the attributed quotes | Three lines are attributed. Three lines are published |
| Published no per-person review markup | Eight schema Review nodes carrying three distinct texts would assert eight reviews that do not exist |
| Published the aggregate the distributor publishes | It is their figure, labelled as their figure, with a Dataset node describing what it is |
The last two rows are the technical half of the same decision. Search engines read structured data, and a site that tells a machine something it would not tell a reader has picked a side.
One further decision, made deliberately. No reviewer photograph appears anywhere on this website. The supplier provides none, and stock portraiture attached to a name is the cheapest way there is to make a handful of summary lines look like a wall of people. A table of real columns is less attractive and it is exactly as informative as the material allows.
Burntide review questions
Why are there no long review quotes on this page?
Because none were supplied. The distributor publishes an aggregate score, a star split and a one-line summary per reviewer. Writing longer quotes to fill the space would be inventing testimonials, which is the single thing this website will not do.
Are these reviews verified purchases?
The distributor supplies them as buyer feedback and this desk publishes them as supplied. This website cannot independently verify an individual review, and it says so rather than printing a verified badge it cannot stand behind.
Why do five reviewers have the same sentence?
Because it is a summary category rather than five people's words. Five of the eight carry "daily habit stuck", two carry "fair at a month" and one carries a third line. That is what a rating summary looks like, and presenting it honestly is more useful than dressing it up.
What does 86% recommend actually mean?
It is the distributor's figure across 1,007 written reviews. Read alongside the star split, which puts 13% at three stars or below, it is consistent. It is not a measure of effect and nobody should read it as one.
Do you publish the negative reviews?
Yes, in the same table and at the same size. The three-star entry is in the roster with the day count attached, and the theme it belongs to is named and counted like the other two.
Order Burntide and judge it on your own roster of one.
The useful number on this page is the 3–6 weeks wait. Buy the pack that covers it and put day 55 in your calendar.
Price and pack sizes are shown on the checkout page
Order Burntide On The Official WebsiteOne gummy a day · 30 per jar · 60-day money-back guarantee · lot BUR-26/BU-7406
References behind this Burntide page
Every source below was opened and checked. None of them studied Burntide itself; they concern the ingredients, at the amounts the researchers used.
- National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements. Dietary Supplements for Weight Loss: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/WeightLoss-HealthProfessional/
- National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements. Dietary Supplements: What You Need to Know. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/WYNTK-Consumer/
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Questions and Answers on Dietary Supplements. https://www.fda.gov/food/information-consumers-using-dietary-supplements/questions-and-answers-dietary-supplements
- U.S. National Library of Medicine, MedlinePlus. Dietary Supplements. https://medlineplus.gov/dietarysupplements.html
- Rios-Hoyo A, Gutierrez-Salmean G. New dietary supplements for obesity: what we currently know. Curr Obes Rep. 2016;5(2):262-70. PMID 27053066. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27053066/
Every page, every journal post, the bottle facts and the ingredients go through review by Dr. Spencer Berry, MD before they ship. We write these pages from the Burntide label, the Supplement Facts panel photographed on the jar, and the distributor’s own paperwork. We cite public research for apple cider vinegar and beta-hydroxybutyrate, and we print “not published” wherever the label withholds a figure rather than estimating it. Where the manufacturer’s own listing artwork claims more than the panel supports, we say so on the page. Corrections are made on the page itself and the review date moves forward. Write to [email protected]. Last reviewed September 2026 by Dr. Spencer Berry, MD.